<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Predicts Talking Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.okkoblog.com/2008/11/28/ibm-predicts-talking-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.okkoblog.com/2008/11/28/ibm-predicts-talking-web/</link>
	<description>Working with speech and language technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:13:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Okko</title>
		<link>http://www.okkoblog.com/2008/11/28/ibm-predicts-talking-web/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Okko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://okkoblog.com/blog/?p=44#comment-13</guid>
		<description>True - an optional voice interface (sort of like a mobile one) is probably a great idea.&lt;br/&gt;Some efforts in this direction exist already, such as VXML+HTML or CSS3.&lt;br/&gt;Most of that is geared to address usability/accessibility problems.  However with speech recognition coming to the iPhone and Android phones, who knows what will happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True &#8211; an optional voice interface (sort of like a mobile one) is probably a great idea.<br />Some efforts in this direction exist already, such as VXML+HTML or CSS3.<br />Most of that is geared to address usability/accessibility problems.  However with speech recognition coming to the iPhone and Android phones, who knows what will happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enbert</title>
		<link>http://www.okkoblog.com/2008/11/28/ibm-predicts-talking-web/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>enbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://okkoblog.com/blog/?p=44#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Enabling the informations of the web to be accessable via voice user interface sounds really charming to me ... as a first impression. &lt;br/&gt;But on secound thoughts, I know there are to many situations I would not use this interface at all. Just imagine the nosies a internet caffee would produce ... You would have to wear headphones all the time ... and cheking the mail on a public transport could be anoing. &lt;br/&gt;What really would make sense, is to have a voice user interface as an additional user interface side by side to established UI&#039;s like GUI. This could extend the possibilities of application ... but I see it as mistake to try establishing a voice based interface as alternative for all purposes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Just my 2 cents&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Norbert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enabling the informations of the web to be accessable via voice user interface sounds really charming to me &#8230; as a first impression. <br />But on secound thoughts, I know there are to many situations I would not use this interface at all. Just imagine the nosies a internet caffee would produce &#8230; You would have to wear headphones all the time &#8230; and cheking the mail on a public transport could be anoing. <br />What really would make sense, is to have a voice user interface as an additional user interface side by side to established UI&#8217;s like GUI. This could extend the possibilities of application &#8230; but I see it as mistake to try establishing a voice based interface as alternative for all purposes.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents</p>
<p>Norbert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
